3 ways a 6-3 Supreme Court would be different

3 ways a 6-3 Supreme Court would be different

If the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is replaced this year, the Supreme Court will become something the country has not seen since the justices became a dominant force in American cultural life after World War II: a decidedly conservative court. A court with a 6-3 conservative majority would be a dramatic shift from the court of recent years, which was more closely divided, with Ginsburg as the leader of the liberal wing of four justices and Chief Justice John Roberts as the frequent swing vote. As a scholar of the court and the politics of belief , I see three things likely to change in an era of a conservative majority: The court will accept a broader range of controversial cases for consideration; the court’s interpretation of constitutional rights will shift; and the future of rights in the era of a conservative court may be in the hands of local democracy rather than the Supreme Court. A broader docket The court takes only cases the justices choose to hear. Five votes on the nine-member court make a majority, but four is the number required to take a case . If Roberts does not want to accept a controversial case, it now requires all four of the conservatives – Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas – to accept the case and risk the outcome. If they are uncertain how Roberts will rule – as many people are – then the conservatives may be not be willing […]

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.