An End to Gun Controls? The Crunch Supreme Court Case Explained

An End to Gun Controls? The Crunch Supreme Court Case Explained

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Wednesday in a challenge to a New York gun licensing law that could prove a crucial case for the future of gun control legislation. At issue in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen is a 108-year-old state law requiring those who wish to carry a concealed weapon to show “proper cause” before receiving a license to do so. Gun advocacy group the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, along with Robert Nash and Brandon Koch, are taking the case and arguing that the state’s denial of licenses to the men violated the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Nash and Koch were denied concealed carry licenses but were granted “restricted” licenses that allow them to carry a gun outside of their home for the purpose of target shooting and hunting. Additionally, Koch is permitted to carry a firearm for self-defense while traveling to and from work. Under the “proper cause” requirement, applicants for a concealed carry license for handguns must show that they have a special need to defend themselves, such as being the subject of repeated physical threats. Advocates believe this requirement violates the Second Amendment. The Court, which now has a 6-3 conservative majority, could upend gun control measures throughout the country if the justices decide to strike down New York’s law. Several states, including California, Massachusetts, Maryland and New Jersey, have similar laws, while several cities have also passed similar measures. Those laws […]

Click here to view original web page at An End to Gun Controls? The Crunch Supreme Court Case Explained

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.