Conservative justices skeptical about New York gun law

Conservative justices skeptical about New York gun law

States with tougher standards for a permit to carry a concealed gun generally require an individual to demonstrate a need for self-protection, referred to as “proper cause.” WASHINGTON — Conservative justices on the U.S. Supreme Court expressed skepticism Wednesday after listening to two hours of oral arguments on a New York law that imposes strict limits on carrying a gun outside the home — a case that will test how far states can go when crafting their own laws. In New York State Rifle & Pistol Assoc. v. Bruen, attorney Paul Clement — former U.S. solicitor general in the Bush administration — argued that New York’s restrictive gun laws infringe on an individual’s Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. “Carrying a firearm outside the home is a fundamental, constitutional right,” he said in his opening presentation to the court. Chief Justice John Roberts said he found it surprising that local officials could make decisions about a constitutional right. Several other members of the court expressed that sentiment, but also agreed that states could decide whether to exclude guns from “sensitive places” in New York such as public transportation, New York University, Columbia University and Times Square on New Year’s Eve. Justices Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh expressed their concern about the high bar applicants needed to meet in order to obtain a gun permit. Barbara Underwood, New York’s solicitor general, defended the state’s law, arguing that the state is not an outlier in its […]

Click here to view original web page at Conservative justices skeptical about New York gun law

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.