First Amendment protects against tyranny better than the Second

You might know this person: he or she has a few guns, strongly supports Second Amendment rights and distrusts the government. Part of the reason they have so many guns is that the government cannot be trusted — you’ll need their armed support to combat an authoritarian and tyrannical Washington one day. Two bumper stickers are neighbors on the rear of their forward-thinking, fuel-efficient Prius. One reads, “Support the Troops,” the other, “The right to bear arms is our only protection from government tyranny.” In this day and age, that job is better done by the First Amendment than the Second. Let’s address the 800-pound gorilla in the room. Or should I say the 62-ton tank. The likelihood of a ragtag band of gun owners routing the U.S. military in small-arms combat is very small. The F-35, a combat aircraft you proudly support with tax dollars, has laser-guided munitions. The laser pointer on your handgun does not stand a chance. The idea that gun owners could collectively organize and complete a revolution against an American government with malicious intent is not only misguided in its intention, it’s ignorant in fact. I saw another bumper sticker the other day I think speaks to the mistaken idea at the center of gun owners against tyranny. It read “The Second Amendment: the Original Homeland Security.” All of these gun-loving bumper stickers make bold claims about training your average AR-15 owner. Times have changed. Weapons technology has evolved. The Second Amendment was written […]

Click here to view original web page at First Amendment protects against tyranny better than the Second