FOP president: Ohio lawmakers ignoring ‘concerns of the men and women who keep your family safe’

FOP president: Ohio lawmakers ignoring 'concerns of the men and women who keep your family safe'

Guest columnist Ohio lawmakers are working to remove the licensing and training requirement for people to carry a concealed weapon. Some call it “constitutional carry,” and assert that the Second Amendment is all that’s needed for citizens to take a hidden gun out in public. The reality is a bit more nuanced than that. When the delegates met at Philadelphia during the sweltering summer of 1787, the task before the Constitutional Convention was almost insurmountable. How, in the face of the revolution just fought, could a coalition of states unite and govern nationally when individual freedom and state sovereignty were paramount? First, they cast the widest possible net for individual freedom. They attached a Bill of Rights, which didn’t lay out the rights given to citizens by the government, but rather reiterated the rights that belong to the people. The understanding was that the government must act in a way respectful of freedom and liberty. Second, delegates sought to limit national government power to certain defined areas like foreign policy and national defense. Third, the framers of the Constitution – and the states they represented – agreed to compromise. This is no minor point. Fast forward back to modern day. Ohio’s concealed carry law is a prime example of modern-day legislators following the example of the founders. It’s a clear nod to individual freedom, embedded in the gun rights of the Second Amendment as well as similar protections in the Ohio Constitution. But it also takes seriously the government’s […]

Click here to view original web page at FOP president: Ohio lawmakers ignoring ‘concerns of the men and women who keep your family safe’

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.