Fresno Bee readers sound off on Roe vs. Wade abortion ruling, Bullard High cellphone ban

Editorials and other Opinion content offer perspectives on issues important to our community and are independent from the work of our newsroom reporters. Pro-abortion rights signs are seen during a March for Life in front of the U.S. Supreme Court. Alex Brandon AP file Supreme Court’s hypocrisy display I am a former clerk for a federal judge of the Eastern District of California and have practiced family law for 30 years. I was 40 when I got married, and it took me and my husband 2 1/2 years with my doctor through fertility drugs to have our incredible daughter, who is now 26. That is choice. My sister-in-law who is a Japanese-American had to wait 11 years before marrying my white brother-in-law and Loving came down. They have two adult daughters. That is choice. The fact that this Supreme Court stripped my daughter and their daughters of a fundamental right to reproductive health and right to privacy is outrageous. My maternal grandmother, who was born in Indiana in 1900, told horror stories about her friend’s back-alley botched abortion. Under Roe, the number of abortions actually drop. The justices ignored precedent, but they testified during their confirmation hearing, that precedent is sacrosanct. They conveniently ignored the constitutionality of Loving when overturning Roe. Some justices displayed immense hypocrisy when they denied American women sovereignty over their own bodies by the states, but struck down the state of New York to regulate guns, so the guns will kill more babies! Elect politicians […]

Click here to view original web page at Fresno Bee readers sound off on Roe vs. Wade abortion ruling, Bullard High cellphone ban

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.