SYDNEY ANDERSON Citizens viewing guns, Photo Courtesy of M&R Glasgow. For many years, gun control laws have become a major debate for many Americans, leaving them conflicted on whether to support or rule against it. While some people are in favor of gun control, believing it restricts killings, others are against it, thinking guns are a form of safety and protection. Gun control regulations violate an individual’s right to self-defense, while also infringing on their right to safety. Nelson Lund, professor at George Mason University of Law states, “The right to self-defense and to the means of defending oneself is a basic natural right that grows out of the right to life.” Charley Reese, a former member of the NRA asserts, “If you believe in the right to life, then you must believe in the right to have the means to defend that life.” Through the second amendment, citizens were given a reason to defend themselves, providing them with a sense of liberty. The second amendment protects individuals’ right to self-defense, which means it should be used for safety precautions. How can someone feel safe without protection? An image of two heads debating over gun control vs gun rights. Photo Courtesy of Raymond Willey. When speaking about gun regulation, many people believe it violates the second amendment. However, the purpose of the second amendment was to protect the right of militias to own guns, as opposed to human rights on guns. Michael Walkman, president of the Brennan Center for […]
Click here to view original web page at Gun Control: Beneficial or Damaging to Citizens?