Jonathan Turley: Second amendment realities – court rulings keep politicians gun control promises in check

Jonathan Turley: Second amendment realities – court rulings keep politicians gun control promises in check

John Turley on possible AR-15 ban: Politicians ‘oversell’ their ability to change gun laws 00:00 00:0008:14GO LIVE Facebook Twitter Email Embed SpeedNormal Autoplay For many years, there has been a growing disconnect between political promises and constitutional realities in the area of gun control. Politicians have run on promises of sweeping gun control legislation that would clearly violate controlling case law under the Second Amendment . After every mass shooting, politicians pledge that they will get guns out of society when they know that such promises mislead voters on the range of permissible action in the area. Despite the columns of many legal experts, that range of legislative action is quite limited as shown last week when a federal judge struck down California’s three-decade-old ban on assault weapons as a violation of the Second Amendment. The decision could be raised in the ongoing consideration of the nomination of David Chipman, who President Joe Biden wants to head the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). In Miller v. Bonta, U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez of San Diego found that the ban on weapons like the AR-15 are based on both a misunderstanding of the weapons and a misinterpretation of the Constitution. Claims surrounding the AR-15 are often detached from the comparative realities of this and other weapons. The AR-15 and other weapons in its class use an intermediate cartridge that actually is less powerful than that used in a rifle. The appeal of guns like the AR-15 is […]

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.