Suit seeks Supreme Court review of Trump’s ban on gun bump stocks

Suit seeks Supreme Court review of Trump's ban on gun bump stocks

A gun owner who lawfully purchased a bump stock years ago has taken his case to the Supreme Court this month, challenging the Trump administration ‘s 2018 reclassification of the devices as unlawful machine guns that must be destroyed. W. Clark Aposhian turned over his bump stock — an attachment that enables a semiautomatic rifle to fire faster like a machine gun — to the government under the new regulation, but the bump stock has been in storage pending the outcome of the legal battle. From 2008 through 2017, bump stocks weren’t classified as machine guns and were allowed to be purchased lawfully. But after the 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas where an individual using the devices shot and killed 58 people and injured hundreds more at a concert, the Trump administration moved to prohibit them. Twelve of the rifles in the shooter’s possession had been modified with bump stocks. The new rule, based on federal law defining machine guns and outlawing them from civilian use, required all bump stocks be handed over to the government by March 26, 2019, and destroyed. The administration reasoned bump stocks fall within the definition of machine guns. It was estimated Americans owned roughly 520,000 bump stocks at the time. Mr. Aposhian argued in court papers that the lower courts ruled that the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms is entitled to “Chevron deference,” upholding its bump stock ban, although the government did not assert Chevron as part of its defense. […]

Click here to view original web page at Suit seeks Supreme Court review of Trump’s ban on gun bump stocks

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.