Supreme Court Considers Scope Of Gun Rights In Major 2nd Amendment Case

Supreme Court Considers Scope Of Gun Rights In Major 2nd Amendment Case

Washington — More than a decade after its last major decision on gun rights, the Supreme Court on Wednesday grappled with whether restrictions on the right to carry a firearm in public for self-defense pass constitutional muster, with the conservative justices sounding skeptical of the breadth of a New York rule that limits those who can. Across nearly two hours of oral arguments in a dispute challenging the New York law, which has been on the books for more than a century, two members of the court’s conservative wing — Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh — raised concerns with the discretion the regime grants to local licensing officers in deciding whether to approve applications from New Yorkers seeking to carry their firearms in public for self-defense. “That’s the real concern, isn’t it, with any constitutional right?” Kavanaugh told Barbara Underwood, New York’s solicitor general. “If it’s the discretion of an individual officer, that seems inconsistent with an objective constitutional right.” The chief justice said the Second Amendment should be interpreted in the same manner as other constitutional rights, and questioned why, under New York’s rules, one has to assert a special need to bear arms in public. “You can say that the right is limited in a particular way, just as First Amendment rights are limited, but the idea that you would need a license to exercise that right I think is unusual in the context of the Bill of Rights,” Roberts told acting Solicitor General […]

Click here to view original web page at Supreme Court Considers Scope Of Gun Rights In Major 2nd Amendment Case

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.