Supreme Court won’t take up gun silencer restrictions

Supreme Court won't take up gun silencer restrictions

SilencerCo CEO Joshua Waldron shows guns with suppressors in West Valley City, Utah on Feb. 23, 2016. Jim Urquhart / Reuters file The Supreme Court said Monday that it will not take up a challenge to a federal law that restricts the ownership of gun silencers, attachments that muffle the sound of gunfire. The court rejected an appeal brought by two Kansas men — Shane Cox, the owner of a military surplus store who sold a silencer, and Jeremy Kettler, the man who bought it. Kettler said he purchased the silencer to protect his ears because his hearing was damaged during military service. He also said the store owner told him that a silencer made and sold in the same state was not subject to the federal law that requires the devices to be registered. That turned out to be bad advice. Both men were convicted and appealed, claiming the law violates their Second Amendment right to bear arms. Gun rights advocates have repeatedly tried to get Congress to ease the restrictions on silencers, but each time those efforts stalled after mass shootings. The governor of Virginia asked his state to consider banning silencers after a man using a handgun equipped with one of the devices killed 12 people last month in Virginia Beach. Under the National Firearms Act, a person wishing to obtain a silencer must submit detailed information and seek permission from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, a process that is much different from […]

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.