Two Oregon counties passed measures to prevent enforcement of firearm regulations

Two Oregon counties passed measures to prevent enforcement of firearm regulations

Columbia and Umatilla counties passed Second Amendment sanctuary ordinances, which may be in violation of state and federal laws. PORTLAND, Ore — On the November ballot, several Oregon counties saw measures to prevent enforcement of firearm regulations. Columbia and Umatilla counties passed the Second Amendment sanctuary ordinances, or “SASOs,” while Coos and Clatsop counties rejected them. These ordinances are intended to prevent county officials from enforcing most state, federal and local firearm regulations, like background checks, firearm registration or tracking and laws regarding open or concealed carry, among others. The ordinances could face legal challenges due to potential conflicts with state and federal law. Unofficial results show 62% of Umatilla County voters supported the SASO. A similar ordinance narrowly passed in Columbia County, 50.78% to 49.22%. Clatsop County rejected the measure by 61 to 38.84%, but the race was closer in Coos County, where 54.3% voted against the measure and 45.19% supported it. In both Columbia and Umatilla counties, the ordinance could prevent county officials from “devoting resources or participating in any way in the enforcement of any law or regulation that affected an individual’s right to keep and bear arms, firearm accessories, or ammunition,” according to election office documents. In Columbia County’s voters guide , the Oregon Firearm Federation wrote, “All ballot measure 5-278 does is ensure your right and ability to defend your life and the lives of your loved ones.” In Columbia and Umatilla counties, individuals who violate the ordinance could be subject to a $2,000 […]

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.